Skip to main content
Skip table of contents

HX-CHX600A

Setup

Fig. 1: VRTK2 with HX-CHX600A

Fig. 2: HX-CHX600A antenna

Antenna phase center:


Test results

Stationary 1

In this test the HX-CHX600A antenna was connected to GNSS2.

Number of tracked signals

Position variance

CN0 timeseries

CN0 histogram

ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas1-chx600a.html

Link to KML file: 2023-01-19-14-09-53

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

Stationary 2

In this test the HX-CHX600A antenna was connected to GNSS1.

Number of tracked signals

Position variance

CN0 timeseries

CN0 histogram

ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas2-chx600a.html

Link to KML file: 2023-01-19-14-36-39

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

Urban canyon

Number of tracked signals

Fix types

Position variance

CN0 timeseries

CN0 histogram

ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas3-chx600a.html

Link to KML file: 2023-01-19-09-56-46

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

GNSS outage

Number of tracked signals

Fix types

Position variance

CN0 timeseries

CN0 histogram

ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas4-chx600a.html

Link to KML file: 2023-01-19-10-11-35

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2


Observations

  • This antenna presents a significantly better signal power distribution.

  • This antenna was able to re-fix significantly faster than our current antenna.

  • This antenna stayed at RTK-float even when our antenna was under Single-3D.


Conclusions

  • Excluding price considerations, this antenna could serve as a higher quality replacement for our current AH-3232 antenna.

  • More testing needs to be done to analyze the effect of false fixes with this antennas.

  • Seems very similar to the reference.

  • Acceptable.

JavaScript errors detected

Please note, these errors can depend on your browser setup.

If this problem persists, please contact our support.