Fixposition Documentation
Fixposition Documentation
Breadcrumbs

HG-GOYH7156

Setup

HG-GOYH7156_vrtk2.png
Fig. 1: VRTK2 with HG-GOYH7156
HG-GOYH7156.png
Fig. 2: HG-GOYH7156 antenna

Antenna phase center:

image-20230526-155341.png

Test results

Stationary 1

In this test the HG-GOYH7156 antenna was connected to GNSS2.

image-20230526-160209.png
Number of tracked signals
image-20230526-160232.png
Position variance
image-20230526-160259.png
CN0 timeseries
image-20230526-160347.png
CN0 histogram
image-20230526-160420.png
ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas1-HG-GOYH7156.html

Link to KML file: 2023-05-25-13-34-07

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

Stationary 2

In this test the HG-GOYH7156 antenna was connected to GNSS1.

image-20230526-160618.png
Number of tracked signals
image-20230526-160647.png
Position variance
image-20230526-160714.png
CN0 timeseries
image-20230526-160732.png
CN0 histogram
image-20230526-160747.png
ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas2-HG-GOYH7156.html

Link to KML file: 2023-05-25-14-04-19

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

Urban canyon
image-20230526-161553.png
Number of tracked signals
image-20230526-161604.png
Fix types
image-20230526-161615.png
Position variance
image-20230526-161629.png
CN0 timeseries
image-20230526-161645.png
CN0 histogram
image-20230526-161706.png
ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas3-HG-GOYH7156.html

Link to KML file: 2023-05-26-09-54-04

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

GNSS outage
image-20230526-161812.png
Number of tracked signals
image-20230526-161823.png
Fix types
image-20230526-161840.png
Position variance
image-20230526-161852.png
CN0 timeseries
image-20230526-161905.png
CN0 histogram
image-20230526-161933.png
ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas4-HG-GOYH7156.html

Link to KML file: 2023-05-26-10-09-02

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

Conclusions

  • It consistently shows a better CN0 compared to the reference.

  • In terms of position accuracy, the difference is insignificant, we may need more tests.

  • Considering the type of antenna, it should perform better in multi-path areas, although we don't observe this behavior in the tests.

  • Acceptable.