Skip to main content
Skip table of contents

HG-GOYH7156

Setup

Fig. 1: VRTK2 with HG-GOYH7156

Fig. 2: HG-GOYH7156 antenna

Antenna phase center:


Test results

Stationary 1

In this test the HG-GOYH7156 antenna was connected to GNSS2.

Number of tracked signals

Position variance

CN0 timeseries

CN0 histogram

ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas1-HG-GOYH7156.html

Link to KML file: 2023-05-25-13-34-07

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

Stationary 2

In this test the HG-GOYH7156 antenna was connected to GNSS1.

Number of tracked signals

Position variance

CN0 timeseries

CN0 histogram

ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas2-HG-GOYH7156.html

Link to KML file: 2023-05-25-14-04-19

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

Urban canyon

Number of tracked signals

Fix types

Position variance

CN0 timeseries

CN0 histogram

ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas3-HG-GOYH7156.html

Link to KML file: 2023-05-26-09-54-04

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2

GNSS outage

Number of tracked signals

Fix types

Position variance

CN0 timeseries

CN0 histogram

ENU position estimate statistics

Timeseries file:

antennas4-HG-GOYH7156.html

Link to KML file: 2023-05-26-10-09-02

Links to raw GNSS data: GNSS1, GNSS2


Conclusions

  • It consistently shows a better CN0 compared to the reference.

  • In terms of position accuracy, the difference is insignificant, we may need more tests.

  • Considering the type of antenna, it should perform better in multi-path areas, although we don't observe this behavior in the tests.

  • Acceptable.

JavaScript errors detected

Please note, these errors can depend on your browser setup.

If this problem persists, please contact our support.